Testable Predictions

1) Planck Thermodynamic Mapping

Planck scales define the natural bridge between temperature and frequency. Let tₚ = √(ħG/c⁵) and ωₚ = 1/tₚ. Then the Planck temperature satisfies:
Tₚ = ħ ωₚ / k_B  = h fₚ / k_B  (with ω = 2π f)
Numerically, Tₚ ≈ 1.416×10³² K. This fixes a one-to-one map between thermal energy k_B T and a characteristic angular frequency ω = k_B T / ħ, enabling a temperature–frequency representation of dimensional states (ρ, Ψ, Φ).

​

2) Dimensional Phase Structure (ρ, Ψ, Φ) as Thermo-Frequency Domains

Define domains by characteristic band limits in angular frequency ω (or frequency f):
• ρ (localized, 3D): ω ~ 10⁹–10¹² s⁻¹ (decoherence thresholds, classical–quantum hinge)
• Ψ (wave, 4D): ω ~ 10²³–10²⁷ s⁻¹ (quantum fields and particle bands; Higgs anchor ~3×10²⁵ Hz)
• Φ (coherence, 5D): ω ~ 10³³–10⁴³ s⁻¹ (black holes, dark sector, Planck regime)

Temperature induces dimensional transitions via k_B T ≈ ħ ω: at T ≈ Tₚ, ω ≈ ωₚ and all boundaries collapse into the Φ domain. At intermediate T, controlled transitions occur between ρ ⇆ Ψ ⇆Φ.

​

3) s-Axis Geometry and Projections

Let Φ(x,y,z,t,s) denote the 5D coherence field, with s the coherence depth. Observable 4D wavefunctions and 3D localizations are projections along s:
Ψ(x,y,z,t) = ∫ Φ(x,y,z,t,s) e^(−s/λₛ) ds
ρ(x,y,z)   = ∫ Ψ(x,y,z,t) δ(t−t₀) dt
Here λₛ is the coherence length in s. The weight e^(−s/λₛ) controls how much Φ projects into Ψ; small λₛ suppresses projection (Φ-dominant), large λₛ enhances it (Ψ/ρ-dominant).

​

4) Mass Law and s-Depth

DM mass law:  m = Eₚ · e^(−n/λₛ),  with n the coherence step number.
Define s-depth for particles by a reference maximum m_max (e.g., top quark):  s = √[−ln(m/m_max)]. Small s → Φ-near, heavy/short-lived; large s → Ψ/ρ-projected, light/stable. This converts mass measurements directly into geometric coordinates.

​

5) Galaxy–SMBH Coherence Condition (Necessity vs. Sufficiency)

Define the galaxy coherence functional C_gal over a spatial region Ω by integrating the projected Φ:
C_gal(Ω) = ∫_Ω ( ∫ Φ(x,t,s) e^(−s/λₛ) ds ) d⁴x
Stability requires C_gal ≥ C_threshold. Let A_Φ be the Φ-anchor strength (e.g., the SMBH coherence amplitude). Then, to leading order:
C_gal ≈ A_Φ · κ(Ψ⇆ρ)
where κ(Ψ⇆ρ) is the coupling factor between Φ and Ψ/ρ degrees. Two key results follow:
• Necessity: If κ(Ψ⇆ρ) > 0 and C_threshold > 0, a stable galaxy implies A_Φ > 0 (an SMBH/Φ anchor exists).
• Not sufficiency: A_Φ > 0 does not imply a galaxy; if κ(Ψ⇆ρ) ≈ 0 the Φ anchor exists without Ψ/ρ structure (naked SMBH).

​

6) Higgs Bottleneck and Bypass Criterion

Let ω_H be the Higgs anchor (ω_H ≈ 2π·3×10²⁵ Hz). Normal mass formation proceeds via Φ→Ψ at ω≈ω_H, then Ψ→ρ:
Φ  —[ω≈ω_H]→  Ψ  —→  ρ
Spectral overlap S(Φ,Ψ; ω) = ∫ Φ̂(ω′) Ψ̂(ω−ω′) dω′. The normal route requires S(Φ,Ψ; ω_H) ≫ 0. A naked SMBH (Φ anchor without galaxy) occurs when the bypass condition holds:
S(Φ,Ψ; ω_H) ≈ 0   and   A_Φ ≫ 0  ⇒  Φ→ρ direct projection (no Ψ scaffolding)
Physically: the Φ spectrum forms a strong coherence core around ω~10³⁹ s⁻¹ while having negligible overlap with the Ψ/Higgs band.

​

7) Coherence Continuity and Conservation

Introduce a coherence density 𝒞(x,t,s) and current J_s(x,t,s) along the s-axis. Continuity encodes redistribution (not loss):
∂𝒞/∂t + ∇·J + ∂J_s/∂s = 0
Global balance between expansion (Big Bang projection) and accumulation (BHs) can be written symbolically as:
ΔI = ∑_{j,k} (ΔT_jk + ΔT̄_jk) e^(−s/λₛ)
with local transitions obeying I_jk = Ψ_jk · e^(−Δs/λₛ). Information is redistributed across coherence boundaries, not destroyed.

​

8) Effective Cosmological Term from s-Projection

Λ_eff = Λ_s · e^(−s/λₛ)
As projection depth s increases (more Φ stabilization), the effective cosmological term perceived in ρ decreases. This models how global coherence modulates local expansion rates and aligns with the cosmic web as Φ-edges.

​

9) Temperature Dependence of the Coherence Factor

Define a dimensionless coherence factor C(T,ω,s):
C(T,ω,s) = exp[ −ΔE_thermal/(ħω) ] · exp[ −s/λₛ ]
Here ΔE_thermal changes sign between cooling (negative) and heating (positive), yet the dimensional progression ρ→Ψ→Φ remains symmetric in (ω,s). Phase boundaries satisfy |ΔE_thermal| ≈ ħω and s ≈ λₛ and appear in ultracold (BEC, superconductivity) and high-energy (fusion, collider) regimes.

​

10) Quantitative Φ–Ψ Coupling Metric and Galaxy Criterion

Let κ = ∫ W(ω) S(Φ,Ψ;ω) dω with W(ω) an instrument/material window. A minimal criterion for galaxy formation is:
A_Φ · κ  ≥  C_threshold   (galaxy exists)
A_Φ · κ  <   C_threshold  (no galaxy; Φ-only object ⇒ naked SMBH)
This formalizes: every galaxy (κ>0) implies an SMBH (A_Φ>0), but an SMBH need not imply a galaxy if κ≈0.

​

11) Worked Placements and Examples

• QSO1 (naked SMBH): ω ≈ 10³⁹ s⁻¹ (Φ band), A_Φ ≫ 0, κ≈0 ⇒ Φ-only anchor, hostless.
• Ordinary SMBH in a galaxy: A_Φ ≫ 0, κ>0 ⇒ Φ anchor plus Ψ/ρ scaffolding.
• Superconductivity (near 0 K): decreasing ΔE_thermal → effective ω dominates; s-projection increases coherence to Φ-like phase (global order).
• High-T plasma approaching fusion: compression raises ω; Ψ overlap and transient Φ coherence enable barrier breach.

​

12)  Coherence Criterion

Galaxy ⇔ (SMBH ∧ κ>0).  SMBH ⇏ Galaxy if κ≈0.
Formally:  Galaxy exists on region Ω iff A_Φ(Ω)·κ(Ω) ≥ C_threshold. This is the precise mathematical statement of: “Every galaxy will have an SMBH; not every SMBH will have a galaxy.”

​​

​

Spectral Overlap and Parameter Fitting in DM

​

Derivation of the Spectral-Overlap Criterion S(Φ,Ψ; ω)

Let Φ(x,t,s) be the 5D coherence field and Ψ(x,t) its projected 4D wave. Consider a linear response of Ψ to Φ with kernel K(t): Ψ(t) = ∫ K(τ) Φ(t−τ) dτ. Taking temporal Fourier transforms (̂·) yields Ψ̂(ω) = K̂(ω) Φ̂(ω). The effective coupling available to build ρ-structures is governed by the spectral overlap between Φ and Ψ within the instrument/material window W(ω):

κ = ∫ W(ω) Φ̂(ω) Ψ̂(ω) dω  = ∫ W(ω) |K̂(ω)| |Φ̂(ω)|² dω

​

In the weak-coupling, broad-band limit where |K̂(ω)| varies slowly across the support of Φ̂, we can define a dimensionless overlap proxy S(Φ,Ψ;ω) by dropping K̂ and using normalized spectra:

S = ∫ W(ω) Φ̂(ω) Ψ̂(ω) dω

​

The galaxy coherence functional reduces to C_gal ≈ A_Φ · κ, where A_Φ is the Φ-anchor strength. Hence the DM galaxy criterion is A_Φ κ ≥ C_threshold. If κ ≈ 0 (negligible overlap), a strong Φ anchor (A_Φ ≫ 0) still fails to produce a galaxy (naked SMBH).

​

Methods for Fitting A_Φ, κ, and λₛ

​

Inputs: multi-band spectra or proxies for Φ and Ψ (e.g., high-energy timing/polarization for Φ; baryonic gas/star-formation tracers for Ψ), and an instrument/material window W(ω).

​

Steps:

1) Normalize Φ̂ and Ψ̂ to unit area over the analysis band; estimate W(ω) from instrument response.

2) Compute the overlap proxy S = ∫ W Φ̂ Ψ̂ dω; set κ = S or κ = ∫ W |K̂| Φ̂ Ψ̂ dω if K̂ is known.

3) Estimate A_Φ from observables tied to coherence strength (e.g., BH mass/compactness proxies, Φ-band variability amplitude).

4) Fit λₛ from projection-weighted observables that depend on e^{−s/λₛ} (e.g., relative suppression of Ψ-rich tracers vs Φ-rich tracers across environments).

5) Galaxy criterion: predict C_gal ≈ A_Φ κ and compare to a calibrated C_threshold from galaxy samples (e.g., minimal star-formation surface density at fixed potential).

​

Synthetic Numerical Example

We model Φ̂(ω) as a Gaussian in log₁₀ ω centered at 10³⁹ s⁻¹ (Φ band) and Ψ̂(ω) as a Gaussian centered either at 10²⁵ s⁻¹ (Higgs-band, decoupled) or at 10³⁹ s⁻¹ (coupled). Using a flat window W, the dimensionless overlaps are:

S_decoupled ≈ 3.9347e-280

S_coupled   ≈ 4.8141e-01

Setting A_Φ = 1 and C_threshold = 0.05 gives A_Φ κ_decoupled ≈ 3.9347e-280 (< threshold → no galaxy) and A_Φ κ_coupled ≈ 4.8141e-01 (> threshold → galaxy). This reproduces the DM statement: a strong Φ anchor produces a galaxy only when spectral overlap with Ψ exists.

Identifiability: A_Φ and κ can be distinguished because (i) A_Φ scales with overall Φ strength (e.g., BH mass/compactness), while (ii) κ changes with spectral alignment (shifting Ψ̂ or altering W). Varying observational bands (W) or selecting environments with different Ψ tracers provides leverage to separate these parameters in fits.

​